[POST] The Origins of the Second American Civil War

Scenario-bridging between today and the horror of Alex Garland's film Civil War

This is a reader-supported publication. I give it all away for free but could really use your support if you want me to keep doing this.

The Contestation Crisis of 2026

Setting:

United States, November 2026

Backdrop:

After the high-stakes midterm elections, results are razor-thin close in numerous Senate and House races. Allegations of voter fraud and irregularities balloon across partisan media ecosystems, pushing the country toward a constitutional confrontation in which the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) persistently blesses the White House’s rapid series of power grabs.

Trigger Event:

President Donald J. Trump declares, in a late-night press conference, that “millions of fraudulent votes” tainted the outcome in dozens of key districts and a handful of Senate races. He directs the Department of Justice and state legislatures controlled by the GOP to withhold certification of those races. Conservative state legislatures thereupon refuse to certify results in dozens of districts, effectively nullifying those seats. This means dozens of Democratic senators and representatives-elect are blocked from being sworn in when the new Congress convenes in January 2027. This pushes Congress into the same odd limbo as SCOTUS: the Trump Administration insists it has maintained “landslide” majorities while opposition leaders call it an “electoral coup.”

Escalation:

Literally millions of angry citizens flood the streets in New York, Detroit, Milwaukee, Boston, Austin, San Antonio, Seattle, Portland, Spokane, Washington, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and Chicago — to name only the million-plus demonstrations that ensue. MAGA counter-protests form in Dallas, Phoenix, and Miami. Sporadic clashes quickly escalate into deadly confrontations between rival groups. The “Boston Massacre” equivalents begin to pile up, further shocking and then infuriating wide swaths of the citizenry.

The President declares that “globalist agitators” and “leftwing criminal lunatics” are orchestrating insurrection, and invokes the Insurrection Act — without governor consent — in more than a dozen states. Businesses shut down in core downtowns, fearing violence, giving the White House the excuse they seek to “take back the streets.” For the first time in its modern history, activists and ordinary citizens engage in massive general strikes, effectively shutting down numerous major metropolitan economies and triggering widespread economic disruption and dislocation. Russia and China both cynically offer the Trump Administration their “peacekeeping forces.” Mexico and Canada close their borders with America.

Federal Overreach:

As clashes persistently break out between demonstrators and police, the President sends unprecedented numbers of National Guard troops and even active-duty Army and Marines into major cities — just as he has done repeatedly in previous years in response to alleged “crime waves.” Armored vehicles roll through city streets while helicopters and armed drones circle overhead. The move is condemned by opposition leaders — and, increasingly, by right-wing and centrist libertarians — as authoritarian overreach but hailed by core MAGA supporters as “restoring law and order” and “taking back America.”

As National Guard units crowd themselves in major US cities, backed in many cases by military-loaned equipment and accompanied by active-duty personnel, governors in states like California, Illinois, and New York openly defy the federal order, instructing their Guard units to remain under state command and refusing Washington’s authority.

Splintering begins: some units heed federal deployment orders, while others remain loyal to their governors. This fracture within the military structure mirrors the growing civilian conflict.

Consequences:

The Trump administration’s political legitimacy dissolves across much of America.. A handful of Democratic governors declare their own state emergencies in opposition, setting up a standoff with the White House.

International observers warn that the US has entered an unknown “constitutional emergency territory.” The political turmoil triggers immediate financial consequences, causing a sharp loss of confidence by international investors in US Treasury bonds. The government is unable to float Treasury bonds abroad, then freezing government spending, further exacerbating the national crisis.

Ordinary citizens face curfews, closed public transport, and disrupted supply lines. There is an explosion of local armed groups claiming to have “secured” their communities against military actions by either side.

Political Collapse:

Journalists, activists, and ordinary families find themselves caught between curfews, shrinking democratic rights, and an increasingly militarized public sphere with massive amounts of guns coming into play on all sides — to include an increasingly fearful and hunkered down general public.

The news cycle becomes fragmented and propagandistic: rival networks broadcast dueling “truths.” Citizens no longer share even a shred of common reality. Many turn away from politics altogether, retreating into local identity-based The-Last-of-US-like communities. Lines harden between “loyalist” and “dissident” states. Numerous “non-combatant” states essentially shut down their borders, “islanding” themselves and, by doing so, further collapsing inter-state trade and travel.

Seeds of Civil War:

By late 2027, the US effectively functions as two overlapping governments: the White House-backed federal authority and a coalition of breakaway state governors working in informal coordination (the precursor to the “Western Forces” and “Florida Alliance” referenced in Garland’s Civil War).

Skirmishes increase, as all manner of armed groups start firing upon one another, either seizing or sabotaging infrastructure and manning roadblocks on interstate highways.

The world comes to view America as the “United States in name only.” Some journalists start describing the Former United States (like the Former Soviet Union), as they embed with insurgent groups throughout the crumbling republic.

Birth of the “Western Forces”:

The coming together of California and Texas in opposition to the Trump administration surprised most Americans, but it was the White House’s nationalization of so much of the private-sector that drove these two very different states into each other’s arms (pun intended).

To the surprise of no one, California resists National Guard federalization after the 2026 election crisis. The White House insists on control, but Sacramento directs its Guard to remain loyal to the governor. Federal attempts to seize bases or weapon stockpiles harden California’s stance into de facto rebellion.

At first supportive of the President, Texas’ relationship sours when the Federal Government nationalizes its energy industry and border security under “continuity of government” emergency powers. Washington begins diverting Texas oil to prop up allied states and restricts Austin’s border autonomy. Texans come to view this as economic colonization and an “Alamo Spirit” movement erupts.

Both states — though politically opposed — suddenly share the experience of extreme federal encroachment: states’ rights leading to partisan alignment. California and Texas are two of the nation’s largest economies. California has tech, ports, agriculture, and aerospace. Texas holds oil, gas, and military bases. Each recognizes they cannot succeed in resisting the Trump regime without an economic ally of equal weight. Their partnership thus begins with a pragmatic trade pact: food-water-energy-tech exchanges secured through state-level coordination.

In sum, this alliance is born less of friendship than raw necessity.

When the President asserts control over multi-state military commands under NORTHCOM and federalizes National Guard units nationwide. Both California and Texas move into a combined resistance mode. Behind closed doors, planners in Sacramento and Austin determine that a joint military effort is necessary to deter rapid federal strangulation. All other “bridges” are left to be crossed and/or burned when later reached.

Birth of the “Florida Alliance”:

Meanwhile, as trust in federal leadership collapses across the disintegrating Union, many southeastern states likewise begin to resist federal mandates, citing violations of states’ rights and the erosion of democratic principles. As economic hardships pile up, a growing paramilitary presence deepens the divide. Amid this The-South-Shall-Rise-Again sentiment, states unite under the shared banner of the Florida Alliance. Formed as a coalition of state governments, local militias, and activist groups determined to reclaim autonomy and resist federal overreach, the alliance eventually constitutes a unified front against the Trump regime they view as having gone off the rails into full-blown military dictatorship.

The Definition of Resistance:

The official Western Forces narrative doesn’t emphasize ideology (Blue v Red) but federal tyranny vs. local sovereignty. California frames it as “resisting authoritarianism, preserving democracy.” Texas frames it as “defending state sovereignty, resisting dictatorship.” Both slogans sell at home and attract the loose affiliation of the Florida Alliance. It becomes a coalition of Over My Dead Body-types, united by the story of fighting an autocratic federal center gone mad. This alliance is no kumbaya moment. The Western Forces and Florida Alliance operate more like an Axis of Convenience than a unified republic.

Fast forward through a handful of warring years, and then begin Alex Garland’s movie here:

Press play.

---

How plausible?

My life-long card-carrying ACLU member spouse recently proposed we both become proficient with handguns, so … I paying more attention alright.

---

---