Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Trexmaster's avatar

Thank you for your patience, Mr Barnett.

-

"1) Duh! Baby duh!"

I've heard of peak oil before. This is the first time I read about peak oil trade. Difference?

You know what's the tragedy of this? I've heard & read other people's opinions (genuine people, desperate people) thinking that oil is regenerative and infinite.

This is the world we're living in...

"3) Climate change affecting space industry"

I have a hunch they're prepping public perception for the eventual decommissioning of the ISS, so that no 'End of the world!' cultists will take advantage of a possible hysteria.

"4) Don’t nuke where you drink"

War, isn't it...

"5) Climate change hits home"

I see two things.

One, the insurance business could collapse as well.

Two, people say they're going to sell their homes.

OK – who's buying?

If they're buying, why are they buying since there's no possibility for insurance, mortgage?

This is what I've asked myself after the California fires: insurance companies stopping issuing or renewing insurance, the fires happens, scalpers are offering cash-in-hand to buy the scorched land... why buy land that can't be insured? Can't be developed?

Something nefarious happening and nobody seems to notice... Mr Barnett, am I seeing white-collar crime in progress where none exists?

"6) Horizontal proliferation"

There's another undercurrent sensation: even with nukes, will those be used?

Russia cannot be trusted. Ever.

They betrayed the order. That's done deal. Eastern Europeans would rather see Moscow a crater, especially those that suffered because of the communism.

"9) Superpower brand self-destruction: Freedom Fries anyone?"

Perhaps somebody read *America's New Map* and, since US will focus to a top-down approach, whatever happens beyond the oceans matter little to none. Perhaps the self-destruction is intentional, as part of becoming a ruthless market player.

"10) I can see the explosive Congressional hearings in my mind"

More torturous population culling.

They know. They know... but they don't want to use doomsday to cut it short.

Sadism? Cynicism?

Sadocynicism.

"12) This is US ag exports on Trump 2.0 — repeating Trump 1.0?"

I've read two comments that I feel the need to copy them here:

«He genuinely thinks of trade deficits as 1-to-1 subsidies, which would be naive on its own but is extra naive in light of Canada’s bilateral trade surplus with the US being almost entirely the result of Canadian oil (and being much smaller than $200B)»

«Donald Trump truly thinks that if you aren't screwing the other guy, he must be screwing you. He has literally zero belief in positive-sum relationships.»

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts