Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Trexmaster's avatar

Lynchian (Buffetian? Engelsian?) capitalism – of “competition is cancerous for wealth accumulation” – meets gun.

Gun wins 11 out of 10 times.

Always.

• In retail bookstore psychology and criminal psychology, the formula is written the same ~ that a person being driven to kill another person isn't light. It isn't a light decision in it of itself by any means.

It isn't something that one wakes up one morning and, instead of having eggs, bacon & toast, they decide to end somebody else's life because “[they] had nothing better to do”.

The moment I've seen the ridiculization and criminal infantilization of the situation, I knew (proven correct, and will continue to be proven correct) that this unidirectional condescendence will only provoke what more people will see as their saving grace to their and everybody else's dreary existence.

It's not “saviour complex”, though many will be tempted to use it as a counteranchor spectacle, it's “we're at the end of our ropes – all n' everyone”. It's a genuine call for desperation, no matter what the 24/7 news & PR declarations will say. I'm not holding my breath for sanity, not from editors.

The family of the CEO will be fine, they have the money to last multiple lifetimes, nobody cares what they think nor feel. The wife is most likely seen as a willing sidekick that approved, as long as her needs & wants were met, at behest of what criticism describes 'value-added human suffering.' Wealthy wives, husbands, and adult offsprings will not be given parlay.

Time to get used to this; a CEO's family isn't any more important than a beggar's family. Chisel it in stone, print it on your money, wear it as a motto on your T-shirt or headwear like a cap.

This isn't Occupy WallSt no more, the game's rules have changed irremediably.

• Criminal psychology goes further ~ when such an event occured, two primordial questions are primed: 'why' and 'how'.

The 'why' is known. An industrial economic sector, of services, tackling a game theory-tier service relating to human health treatment, within the commercial laws of costs-benefits. The perpetrator, one way or another, belonged to this simulation of its consequences, directly (themselves) or indirectly (somebody they knew).

The 'how' is more important in this situation: the perpetrator used a gun. The gun isn't a commercial weaponry, with the usual suspects being the manufacturers and userbase accustomed to American 2A realities.

No.

The gun was a veterinary pistol, a model out of many used to silently kill animals for consumption (cattle, ovine...) or euthanasia (equine...). In criminal psychology, this isn't happenstance. I won't care what PR spokespeople will have to regurgitate, be it police, hospital, law firms, breaking news etc.

Back to the previous point; after the decision was made to end somebody else's life, the method used by perpetrators is the most important detail. Amateurs will say that, it doesn't matter how, just as long it does the job done.

That's a naive, uninteresting, unrelated conclusion.

Human killings always had a symbolism attached to it, a leitmotif, a rhyme *with* a reason. A “I have the last laugh” culmination.

The veterinary pistol isn't an accident. I haven't looked it up myself (I don't know this niche part of what veterinarians do), it's either a Brügger & Thomet VP9 or an antiquarian's Welrod.

What matters in the 'how' is this, that the perpetrator using an euthanasia veterinary pistol to kill a wealthy person – CEO of a crème de la crème service company of its economic sector – is nothing short of the perpetrator declaring “I'm damaging you the same way you've damaged me/my person(s) of interest – like insects, like parasites. It's your turn.”

He could've used many more uninteresting ways to do the deed. The veterinary euthanasia pistol adds a tonne of weight for what just happened.

Whether his lawyers will prove him insane or not, it doesn't matter.

The message has been sent for all to look at it, and criminal psychologists know this isn't an average yellow case.

It's crimson.

Expand full comment
Trey White's avatar

Powerful piece. Many have lashed out after the shooting this one provided context even if it comes from a dark place.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts